MARITIME AID POLICIES OF SELECT COUNTRIES
Overview:
In efforts
to preserve and expand their fleets by making them more competitive,
many nations are developing aggressive maritime promotional
policies. Prominent among them are several European and Asian
nations that have enacted measures -- including major tax
incentives, direct subsidies, and ship financing schemes --
aimed at benefiting shipowners operating under their national
flags, thus enhancing the appeal of their ship registries
against flags of convenience. These efforts have greatly intensified
in recent years.
The information
that follows is not presented as an exhaustive review of all
the maritime aid programs being offered by foreign governments,
or even of the entire array of maritime aid measures now in
effect in European Union (EU) member states and other European
countries. By describing many of the key maritime aid provisions
that have been adopted by several European governments, this
information is intended to draw attention to the fact that
other maritime nations, recognizing the immense economic importance
of their national-flag fleets, are intent on strengthening
those fleets by adopting aggressive promotional measures.
In short,
European and other foreign nations are taking bold and effective
action to enhance the international appeal of their ship registries.
Without countervailing action by U.S. policymakers, the aggressive
policies being pursued by European nations to attract maritime
business will work to the great disadvantage of U.S.-flag
cargo and passenger ships attempting to operate in international
trades. However, the negative competitive impact can extend
to U.S. domestic operations as well.
U.S.-flag
vessels operating in U.S. domestic trades will be adversely
affected when American buyers purchase goods or leisure travel
services from foreign sources, preferring to ship their goods
or take their vacation cruises on vessels registered in countries
whose maritime policies have reduced vessel operating costs
to such a degree that prices for goods and services produced
in the United States substantially exceed those for the same
types of goods and services obtained via foreign-flag operators.
These
policies, if not matched by the United States, will have an
especially deleterious effect on any U.S.-flag cruise ships
attempting to operate in both international and U.S. domestic
trades. This is because operators in the intensely competitive
cruise industry, in which overall supply (capacity) typically
exceeds demand, are competing for a fixed amount of travel/vacation
dollars, the supply of which changes only gradually over time.
Value-conscious cruise customers can be expected to choose
the cruise line that gives them the most value for their money.
Between two cruise lines providing similar shipboard amenities,
they are likely to choose the one offering the lower rate.
Considering that nearly all foreign-flag cruise ships are
built with large subsidies and pay no U.S. corporate or crew
payroll taxes, the advantage can be overwhelming.
Belgium:
(updated
July, 2004)
On March
19, 2003, the European Commission (EC) announced that it had
decided to approve several tax measures including a tonnage
tax scheme, enacted by Belgium to aid its maritime sector.
The
new tax provisions are already sparking renewed interest in
the Belgian flag, which Belgian ship owners abandoned en masse
in 1991.
For example,
Belgian ship owner CMB, which transferred its entire fleet
to the Luxembourg register in 1991, announced in May that
it planned to bring about 20 ships under the national flag.
SOME
KEY PROVISIONS OF BELGIUM'S TONNAGE TAX SYSTEM
The tonnage
tax regime applies to Belgian companies (and Belgian branches
of foreign companies) that are:
|
|
the
owner, joint owner, or usufructuary of a ship that isn't
subject to a bareboat charter; or |
|
|
the
bareboat charterer of a non-Belgian-owned ship. |
Belgian
companies or branches that are engaged in the management of
ships on behalf of third-party owners can also take advantage
of the tonnage tax regime. To qualify, however, they must
meet additional conditions: At least 75 percent of the ships
must be registered in the Belgian ship register, and the company
or branch must be exclusively engaged in ship management.
The tonnage
tax regime is an optional one; a shipping company must explicitly
request its application. When an application is granted, the
tax regime enters into effect for the year following the year
in which the application was submitted. For example, if the
request was filed in 2002, the regime applies to income earned
in fiscal 2003 (tax assessment year 2004).
The tonnage
tax regime is granted for an initial period of 10 years, with
an automatic renewal every 10 years. An operator can leave
the regime, provided he or she gives notice at least three
months before the end of the 10-year period.
Computing
the Tonnage Tax
The tonnage
tax is determined on a notional tax basis, which is then subject
to the ordinary corporate income tax rate of 33.99 percent.
The notional
tax basis is computed per ship, per day, and per 100 net tons,
in accordance with the scale below.
For Belgian
companies or branches that manage ships on behalf of third-party
owners, the notional tax basis is computed per ship, per day,
and per 1,000 net tons, in accordance with the following
scale:
Up to
1,000 tons, euro 1.00
Between 1,001 tons and 10,000 tons, euro 0.60
Between 10,001 tons and 20,000 tons, euro 0.40
Between 20,001 tons and 40,000 tons, euro 0.20
Over 40,000 tons, euro 0.05
The
capital gains (or losses) on the disposition of ships are
not taxable (or deductible) and are deemed to be included
in the notional tax basis of a company or branch that has
elected to enter the tonnage tax regime.
Cyprus
(updated
March, 2004)
Cyprus
offers significant tax incentives to shipping companies, including
the following:
|
|
No
income tax is payable on the profits from the operation
of a Cyprus-registered vessel. |
|
|
No
capital gains tax is payable on the sale or transfer of
a ship. |
|
|
No
income tax is payable on the salaries of officers and
ratings employed on Cyprus-registered ships operated in
international waters. |
|
|
Vessels
registered in Cyprus are subject to a very low tonnage
tax. |
SOME
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE CYPRIOT TONNAGE TAX SYSTEM
For vessels
other than passenger ships, the tonnage tax is calculated
as follows:
(BASIC
CHARGE + GROSS TONNAGE INCREMENT) x AGE MULTIPLIER
The basic
charge is CYŁ100, and the gross tonnage increment is calculated
as follows:
| |
GROSS
TONNAGE |
CENTS
|
| |
|
|
|
|
For
each unit up to 1,600 |
26
|
|
|
For
each unit between 1,601 and 10,000 |
16
|
|
|
For
each unit between 10,001 and 50,000 |
6
|
|
|
For
each unit over 50,000 |
4
|
The age
multiplier is shown below:
| |
AGE* |
SHIP
RATE MULTIPLIER
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Up
to 10 years |
0.75
|
|
|
11-20
years |
1.00
|
|
|
Over
20 years |
1.30
|
| |
|
|
| *
This is calculated by deducting the year in which the
keel was laid from the year of assessment of the tonnage
tax |
For passenger
ships the tonnage tax payable is double that payable for other
ships. The tonnage tax is payable in biannual installments,
on 1 January and 1 July.
If a
vessel's crewing and technical management is carried out by
companies operating in Cyprus, a 30 percent reduction of the
tonnage tax is allowed, provided the relevant documentary
evidence is submitted to the Department of Merchant Shipping.
The law
further provides that if Cypriot citizens are employed as
members of a vessel's crew, a percentage of the tonnage tax
owed on the vessel may be refunded for each month they are
employed on board.
In addition,
if a ship is laid up for a period of more than three consecutive
months, the tonnage tax payable is reduced by 75 percent for
the period during which the ship is idle. However, the maximum
reduction or refund cannot exceed 50 percent of the tonnage
tax due.
Denmark:
(updated
March, 2004)
In its
draft
budget for 2001, introduced at the end of August 2000, the
Danish government stated its intention to introduce a tonnage
tax system, but without setting a timetable.
At the
time, Danish shipowners reacted negatively to the government's
proposal to combine a tonnage tax with a requirement that
owners also include a "shadow calculation" of tax liability
based on the regular corporation tax system. They wanted a
tonnage tax without side calculations.
They now
have it. Denmark's current government, elected in November
2001, offered a tonnage tax as part of a wider package of
measures intended to stimulate business.
In presenting
the tax proposal as part of its 2002 finance bill, the government
said Denmark should still be an attractive country in which
to operate shipping. "That requires that tax rules do not
diverge substantially from rules offered in other countries."
Denmark's
tonnage tax regime, which received approval from the European
Commission in March 2002, is similar to the United Kingdom's.
Danish
maritime shipping companies may opt into the tonnage tax scheme
for renewable 10-year periods, allowing them to calculate
their tax liability by reference to a fixed daily rate on
the capacity (tonnage) of ships employed (per 100 net tonnage).
In 1989,
Denmark implemented fiscal reduction measures for seafarers
on board Danish vessels registered in either the ordinary
register (DAS) or the second register (DIS).
Under
these measures, which went into effect January 1, 1989, seafarers
working on DAS- or DIS-registered vessels benefit from income
tax reductions, though the income tax regime for the DAS register
is less favorable.
The European
Commission (EC) belatedly announced its approval of them on
November 13, 2002, following a complaint that the favorable
fiscal regime should be limited to European Union nationals.
The EC
noted that all seafarers on board both DAS- and DIS-registered
vessels are subject - at least in principle - to income tax
in Denmark even though their fiscal treatment significantly
reduces, or even eliminates, their tax liability.
"The
Commission is thus of the opinion that the fiscal measures
related to the income tax of seafarers in maritime transport
in Denmark are so far compatible with European State aid rules,"
according to a press release on the subject.
SOME KEY PROVISIONS OF DENMARK'S TONNAGE TAX SYSTEM
The Danish
tonnage tax regime is open to limited shipping companies registered
in Denmark, EU shipping companies with a permanent establishment
in Denmark, and all companies whose management is located
in Denmark, provided that the company has corporation tax
liability in Denmark.
Shipping
companies can choose between the tonnage tax and the ordinary
corporate tax. The decision, once made, is binding for a period
of 10 years. Qualified companies are obliged to choose between
the two options before they file their income tax for the
year in which they qualify for tonnage taxation.
All qualifying
shipping companies within a group are required to choose the
same taxation system. However, individual companies with separate
and independent management, and clearly different business
activities, can apply for separate taxation.
Only
income deriving from the shipping business (the transport
of goods or passengers) and associated activities is covered
by the tonnage tax system. Associated business includes such
activities as the operation and maintenance of dockyards,
passenger terminals, containers, ticket offices, and other
related office facilities.
Activities
not qualifying under the tonnage tax system include fishing,
dredging and the extraction of hydrocarbons. Qualifying vessels
include cable-laying ships, shuttle tankers and stand-by vessels,
but not engineering ships.
Qualifying
income is derived from vessels that a company owns or charters,
including time-chartered vessels of 20 gross tons or more.
The leasing of ships is not considered shipping business for
tonnage tax purposes.
Computing
the Tonnage Tax
Each ship's
tonnage income is calculated as follows, on the basis of a
fixed amount per 100 net tons:
|
|
For
each 100 tons up to 1,000 tons, DKK 7 |
|
|
For
each 100 tons between 1,000 tons and 10,000 tons, DKK
5 |
|
|
For
each 100 tons between 10,000 tons and 25,000 tons, DKK
3 |
|
|
For
each 100 tons above 25,000 tons, DKK 2 |
Tonnage
income is calculated on a daily basis, regardless of the ship's
operating status, and taxed at a rate of 30 percent annually,
Denmark's ordinary corporate tax rate.
Capital
gains related to the sale of ships are taxed at the same rate.
Finland:
(updated
January, 2004)
While
the Finnish-flag fleet has been stable in recent years, the
industry is currently threatened with an exodus of vessels
to foreign registers as owners face growing pressure to respond
to the new competitive climate. For example, Finnlines and
Viking Line have both announced plans to re-flag ships.
Under
s subsidity system introduced in 1992 to compensate shipowners
for the higher cost of employing local seafarers, Finnish-flag
cargo vessels with a domestic crew and trading to and from
Finland, in the international trade, became eligible for the
repayment of seafarers' income taxes and three to five percent
of social security payments. This subsidy system did not extend
to ferries and passenger ships. (Under
the Finnish Foreign Merchant Shipping Registry Act, only cargo
vessels used primarily in international trade and passenger
vessels not regularly calling at Finnish ports were eligible
for state aid.)
In 2002,
the government of Finland granted full restitution of all
social security costs for seafarers, but again only for those
employed on Finnish-flag cargo ships for seafarers.
Another provision, which also applies only to cargo ships,
allows up to 50 percent of a ships's crew to be hired from
non-European Union countries.
On March
2002, the European Commission approved a Finnish scheme providing
a subsidy to passenger vessels. The subsidy scheme gives EU
seafarers working on board Finnish passenger ships a 97-percent
reduction of withholding tax on their marine work income.
The tax
relief benefits Finnish passenger vessels engaged in international
transport and calling regularly at Finnish ports.
Also in
2002, after much debate, Finland's parliment ratified legislation
implementing a tonnage tax system. The measure follows Norway's
tonnage tax rules, whereby only revenues retained in a company
for future investment in its shipping operations qualify for
the tonnage tax; while those paid to shareholders in the form
of dividends would be taxed at the normal corporate income
tax rate of 29 percent. (Norway's tonnage tax system allows
taxes to be deferred until such time as profits are distributed.)
The reaction
among Finnish shipowners to the tonnage tax system has been
generally negative, especially among large owners. Some industry
representatives have been harshly critical.
"The
system is a total disaster from start to finish," said
Henrik Longqvist, acting managing director of the Finnish
Shipowners' Association, who predicted that not a single ship
would choose the tonnage tax over the traditional tax regime.
The big
owners say the system does not provide satisfactory treatment
of so-called "hidden tax debt" represented by depreciation.
Ferry
operators complain that it does not cover revenue from duty-free
sales on passenger ships.
Shipowners
in Finland are also unhappy with the fact that the provision
granting full refunds of crew taxes and social costs, and
the one allowing up to 50 percent of a ship's crew to be hired
from non-European Union countries, are restricted only to
cargo vessels.
Despite
the negative feedback from shipowners, the government of Finland
said it had no plans to modify the tonnage tax system.
RECENT
DEVELOPMENT: Helsinki announced in November 2003 that,
effective from January 2004, it would revise its maritime
policy to allow owners of both cargo and passenger vessels
to receive a full refund for tax and social security payments
made on behalf of seafarers. The "net wage" system, based
on the Swedish model, also permits funds received from ship
sales to be set aside untaxed if they are used to acquire
replacement tonnage.
France:
(updated
May, 2004)
Quirats
System
In the
summer of 1996, the French parliament approved a "quirats"
system (which came into force in October 1996) whereby private
investors could buy shares in French-flag ships in return
for tax breaks. The now-defunct instrument, which was to have
been available for investments subscribed up to the end of
the year 2000, allowed individual investors to deduct up to
FFr500,000 ($65,200)* and firms applying together up to FFr1
million ($130,400) annually from their taxable income provided
the sum was invested in ships under the French flag. Ships
financed under the quirats system must remain under the French
or Kerguelan flag until the year 2001.
The quirats
system covered both merchant tonnage and passenger ships.
The ships concerned could be new or secondhand but had to
be certified as having a useful life of eight years and delivered
within 30 months of the investment being subscribed. In addition,
owners themselves were required to provide 20 percent of the
purchase cost. Each application had to be individually approved
by the government. The system was the centerpiece of an attempt
by the French government to strengthen the French-flag merchant
fleet.
As of
May 1997, some FFr3,500 million to FFr4,000 million ($456.4
million to $521.6 million) worth of ships had been financed
under the quirats system. "Not too long ago there was talk
of the French fleet withering to nothing," said Philippe Poirier
D'Ange D'Orsay, president of the French Shipowners' Association.
"All that has changed. Quirats has stirred fresh dynamism
and optimism."
In December
1997, after many debates on the issue, the French parliament's
lower house -- National Assembly -- abolished the short-lived
quirats system over the heated protests of French shipowners.
The decision came during deliberations on France's budget
for 1998, and overturned a Senate vote in favor of the system.
All contracts signed under quirats before September 15, 1997
were deemed legal and allowed to proceed.
Pons
System
France
also has in place what is known as the "Pons" system, under
which a ship operating company may raise 100% of the money
needed to finance ship construction from private investors,
and after five years of operation acquire the ship at 50 percent
of its construction cost. Investors in ships financed under
the Pons system are entitled to deduct a certain amount of
their investment from their taxable income. Ships financed
under the Pons system must fly the French flag and operate
within French territories. (Vessels ordered under the alternative
Quirats system are not limited to French territories, provided
they fly the French flag for a minimum of five years.) Further,
the master and other senior officers of ships financed under
the Pons system must be French nationals.
France
also provides direct subsidies to the French shipping industry.
The subsidies amounted to FFr201 million ($26.2 million) in
1997. The money is used to compensate for the high cost to
French shipowners of sailing under the French flag, both in
salaries and in the social charges levied by the government.
In
November 1999, French shipowners' association CCAF proposed
a set of reforms aimed at enhancing the flag's competitiveness
internationally and to safeguard the domestic fleet. The proposed
measures included the introduction of a lump-sum tonnage tax,
tax-exempt status for seamen's salaries, and the abolition
of social charges for seafarers. Another proposal called for
the government to expand on France's strategy of having three
separate flags for different shipping sectors.
The French
transport minister had announced months earlier that his ministry
was considering a reform of existing regulations governing
the French flag, without providing any details. Then, in early
2000, the French government let it be known that it would
propose measures shortly to make the French flag more attractive
to ship operators.
It was
reported that the government planned to reform France's international
registry, commonly known as the Kerguelen registry, to enhance
its appeal. Under the proposed changes, shipowners would be
given greater freedom in the use of non-French seafarers.
Currently, crews on Kerguelen-flag vessels must be 35 percent
French, but the government indicated that shipowners would
be allowed more flexibility in meeting this requirement, probably
by letting them apply the percentage as a fleet-wide average
rather than as a minimum requirement for each vessel.
The government
also announced its intention to extend existing employer social
charge reimbursements to family allowance and employment pay
contributions, and to review policies pertaining to taxation
of capital gains from the sale of French-flag ships. Consideration
was given to the possibility of exempting proceeds from the
sale of French-flag vessels from the capital gains tax in
the event that the proceeds were reinvested in another French-flag
ship within five years of the sale. News reports indicated
that the French government seemed to prefer this form of tax
relief to the tonnage tax proposed by shipowners.
The French
government also proposed opening the Kerguelen registry to
cruise ships.
The government
then decided to commission a fresh study by outside experts
who, in the report they produced a few months later, agreed
with the owners that the French flag merchant fleet is at
a serious cost disadvantage in relation to its European neighbors
and, without supportive action, faces extinction.
"Without
flexibility on all sides, the future of the French merchant
fleet will be inscribed under one or several foreign flags,"
according to the report.
While
arguing that the French government has done less to help the
shipping sector than its counterparts in other European countries,
the report came up with surprisingly few hard-and-fast recommendations
for remedying the situation.
It supported
the owners' claim for exemption from social charges for crew
members but suggested that the tonnage tax might not bring
the benefits they expect.
Above
all, it called for a revision of the Kerguelen register, making
it available for all categories of ships operating in international
markets.
The report
accepted the need to give owners some flexibility in meeting
the 35 percent requirement, but the Central Committee of French
Shipowners expressed strong reservations about the further
recommendation that shipping companies be obliged to give
long-term guarantees regarding the maintenance of seafarers'
jobs.
Overall,
the report won a mixed response from the shipowners' committee.
In April
2001, after months of negotiations, the French shipowners'
committee announced that it had reached conditional agreement
with all the leading seafarers' unions except one in regard
to manning requirements for the Kerguelen registry.
The agreement
would allow shipowners to make virtually unlimited use of
non-French seafarers on ships new to the Kerguelen fleet,
requiring only the master and second officer to be French.
In return
for this concession from the unions, French shipowners agreed
to abide by the 35 percent minimum French crewing requirement
on vessels in the existing Kerguelen fleet. Instead of being
applied on a vessel-by-vessel basis, however, the percentage
requirement would be applied on a company-wide basis, allowing
variations in French crewing levels from one vessel to another.
The unions
remained unwilling to conclude agreement on the 35-percent
rule, however, without further progress on other aspects of
the reform, which covers such areas as union representation
for Kerguelen crews and social security cover for foreign
seafarers employed on Kerguelen vessels.
And until
shipowners and unions reached full agreement on all aspects
of the reform, the French government was unwilling to put
any of it into effect.
For example,
an item in the 2002 Finance Bill, published in September 2001,
provided for the reimbursement of seafarers' social charges
not already covered by their social security system. However,
the transport ministry indicated in its note of presentation
of its proposed 2002 budget that this measure would not apply
to seafarers aboard vessels on the Kerguelen register until
talks between owners and unions had been completed - a decision
which drew protests from shipowners.
But the
government took what was reported to be a significant step
forward in March 2002 by adopting an ordonnance giving
its agreement in principle to owners' pleas for greater freedom
to use foreign seafarers in vessels using the Kerguelen register.
The ordonnance needs to be completed by a decree requiring
approval from the Council of State.
Though
French shipowners failed to persuade the government to include
a tonnage tax in the 2002 Finance Bill, one was included in
a package of transport measures proposed by Union en Mouvement,
the grouping behind President Chirac's successful bid for
re-election in May 2002.
Following
the election, French
shipowners' leader Philippe Louis-Dreyfus, said he was "relatively
optimistic" about the prospects for French shipping under
the new government.
He indicated
that French owners were hopeful that the government would
move to end the blockage on flag reform, allowing them greater
freedom in the use of non-French seafarers on France's second
register.
They attach
particular importance to the total reimbursement of employer
social security contributions, promised but never carried
out by the previous government.
French
shipowners also continue to push for tax-exempt status for
seafarers' salaries.
In December
2002, the French parliament approved legislation providing
for the creation of a tonnage tax, two months after the French
government gave the go-ahead for adoption of a tonnage-tax
system in 2003.
France's
tonnage tax regime, which received European Commission approval
in May 2003, is available to companies drawing over 75 percent
of their revenues from commercial shipping and can be applied
to vessels of 50 Universal Measurement System (UMS) units
or more.
Tugs,
dredgers, fishing boats and fixed vessels are not included.
Another
significant development came in April 2003 with the announcement
that France had agreed to set up a new international register
to replace the French Southern Antarctic Territories register,
more commonly referred to as the Kerguelen flag.
The proposal
to create the French International Register (FIR), which would
virtually eliminate the French nationality requirement aboard
French-flag vessels, was made in a government-commissioned
report produced by Henri de Richemont, a senator and maritime
lawyer.
Under
the FIR, only the captain and his second officer must be French,
whereas crews on ships under the existing Kerguelen flag are
required to be 35 percent French.
Other
proposals offered by Mr. De Richemont include significant
tax relief for seafarers' salaries, outright elimination of
employer social security charges for vessel owners rather
than the present policy of reimbursing them for such charges,
and tax relief for road haulers willing to use maritime cabotage.
The FIR
is expected to provide substantial operating savings compared
to the French second register of the Kerguelen Islands.
In November,
Dominique Bussereau, France's secretary of state for transport
and the sea, confirmed that the FIR was on schedule to be
adopted by January 1, 2004, adding that the text was almost
finalized and was being reviewed by the Merchant Marine Council.
Paris
rethinks plan for second register: French President Jacques
Chirac, reacting to opposition party gains in regional council
elections in March 2004, appointed a new government under
Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin. The new government announced
in April that the bill to create a new French international
register had been taken off the government's legislative timetable.
While
strongly favored by French shipowners, the measure drew fierce
opposition from French seafarers' unions, which had waged
a concerted campaign of industrial action against the proposal.
Francois
Goulard, who replaced Mr. Bussereau as secretary of state
for transport and the sea, asked Bernard Scemama, chairman
of the Higher Council for the Merchant Marine, to act as a
mediator between the unions and shipowers.
Mr. Goulard
said the government's future approach to the issue would be
decided on the basis of conclusions reached by Mr. Scemama
following the discussions. A new bill is expected soon.
SOME KEY PROVISIONS OF FRANCE'S TONNAGE TAX SYSTEM
France's
tonnage tax regime is open to companies that are liable to
the French corporation tax, and which generate more than 75
percent of their revenues from the operation of commercial
ships.
Owners
or joint owners of qualifying ships (commercial ships of 50
or more gross tons, operated for the carriage of passengers
or goods, towage in high seas, salvage activities, or maritime
assistance or transport in connection with activities necessarily
provided at sea) may elect to enter the tonnage tax system
for a renewable and binding 10-year period if:
|
|
They
operate the ships directly. |
|
|
Ships
are time-chartered or voyage-chartered. |
|
|
Ships
are bareboat-chartered, provided that the bareboat charterer
is a related company (as defined in article 39-12 of the
French Tax Code) that also has opted for the tonnage tax. |
Bareboat
charterers and time charterers also may elect to adopt the
tonnage tax regime with respect to the same qualifying ships,
while voyage charterers are excluded from the regime.
Fishing
vessels, dredgers and ships operated for port activities are
excluded as well.
For existing
companies that qualified for the tonnage tax system at the
time of its inception, the deadline for electing to enter
it is December 31, 2004. Companies that become eligible to
enter the system after that date are afforded only a limited
window of opportunity: If they are to enter, they must do
so during the financial year in which they become eligible
or the following one.
Vessels
need not be registered under the French flag in order to qualify
for the tonnage tax, but they must be strategically and commercially
managed from France.
Computing
the Tonnage Tax
The corporation
tax rate (33.33%) is applied to profits, calculated on a ship-by-ship
basis as follows:
STEP
1 - calculate the daily profit per ship
This
calculation is made by reference to an amount of profits
for each 100 net tons.
For
each 100 tons up to 1,000 tons, euro 0.93
For each 100 tons between 1000 tons and 10,000 tons, euro
0.71
For each 100 tons between 10,000 tons and 25,000 tons, euro
0.47
For each 100 tons above 25,000 tons, euro 0.24
STEP
2 - calculate the profit per ship for the accounting period
Multiply
the daily profit for each ship by the number of days that
the ship is actually operated by the company during the
accounting period.
STEP
3 - calculate the tax owed
Multiply
the profit for each ship by 33.33 percent, the corporate
tax rate.
EXAMPLE
For
a ship of 50,000 tons, tonnage taxes for a 365-day accounting
period would amount to 24,781.02 euros.
Capital
gains resulting from the sale of ships that are purchased
and sold while under the tonnage tax regime are exempt from
taxes.
The following
items of income are added back to the tonnage tax profits:
|
|
Cancellation
of debt, grants and acts of liberality made in favor of
the company within the tonnage tax regime by a related
company that has not opted to enter the regime. |
|
|
Income
generated by pass-through entities, except in the case
of joint-ownership of vessels that are eligible for the
tonnage tax regime. |
|
|
Profits
arising from the disposal of assets used in the operation
of eligible ships. |
|
|
Gains
generated by the voluntary revaluation of ships and fixed
assets used in the operation of ships. |
|
|
Gains
on capital contributions related to depreciable assets
with respect to merger, spin off or partial business transfer
- gains that benefit from the favorable tax regime of
article 210 A of the French Tax Code. |
|
|
Interest
calculated on the basis of the portion of shareholders'
equity that exceeds twice the amount of the debts of the
company plus the lease payments remaining due at the end
of the financial year and the residual price of the assets
leased |
*
Equivalent U.S. dollar amounts given herein are based on the
rates of exchange for the U.S. dollar against the particular
foreign currency as of June 21, 2001, as listed in The Wall
Street Journal on June 22, 2001.
Germany:
(updated
April, 2004)
Effective
January 1, 1999, the German government adopted measures intended
to bring substantial tax relief -- an estimated Dm160 million
($70 million) annually -- for the German-flag shipping industry.
Following the model of the Netherlands, Germany allows shipowners
to choose between a flat-rate tonnage tax and the normal income
tax. Owners have three years after ordering a new vessel to
decide whether they want to be covered by the normal German
tax system or the tonnage tax, while owners of existing ships
must decide by December 31, 2001. The choice, once made, remains
in force for 10 years. Operations for vessels under the tonnage
tax have to be run from Germany.
Under
the special tax regime, taxable income is determined on the
basis of a ship's tonnage, and the income so determined is
taxable (federal corporation tax and municipal trade tax)
at ordinary rates. The annual income for each ship is deemed
equal to the following flat rates: Dm1.80 per 100 net tons
per day for ships under 1,000 net tons, Dm1.35 for vessels
between 1,000 net tons and 10,000 net tons, Dm0.90 up to 25,000
net tons, and Dm0.45 for tonnage above 25,000. The tonnage
tax has to be paid even if the vessel produces a loss.
German
shipowners are allowed to retain 40 percent of the income
tax, which is deducted at source, for seafarers that work
at least 183 days a year on German-flag ships in international
trades.
In addition,
the German government has appropriated more than $128 million
(to be paid out between 2001 and 2006) to subsidize the non-wage
labor costs of operating German-flag vessels.
In May
2002, the European Commission (EC) approved a euro4.1M ($3.7M)
aid scheme to help maritime shipping companies finance the
training of seafarers on German merchant ships.
EC approval
cleared the way for the German government to allocate up to
euro25,500 ($23,000) per trainee.
Aid contributions
will be given to seafarers on German-registered ships. European
citizens qualify for the training grant if they are trained
as additional crew members on merchant ships suitable for
training purposes.
The German
aid scheme, which aims at safeguarding and developing European
maritime expertise while reducing labor costs, is in line
with the objectives and principles outlined in the guidelines
on state aid to the maritime transport sector that were adopted
by the EC in 1997.
The EC
ruled that the German aid plan is non-discriminatory, transparent
and compatible with European competition rules.
RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS: In May 2003, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder
announced that the share of the income tax paid by seamen
that owners can keep as a subsidy would increase from the
current 40 percent to 80 percent. (Under European Union guidelines
for state aid to maritime transport, owners can be allowed
to keep up to 100 percent of the income tax paid by seafarers.)
Germany's
latest budget, passed on July 2, includes financial aid for
German shipping companies in the amount of 45M euros ($51.7M)
a year in 2004 and 2005. The aid, in the form of income tax
relief and crew social payment concessions for owners flying
the German flag, fulfills the promise made by Chancellor Schroeder
in May, the German transport minister said.
SOME
KEY PROVISIONS OF GERMANY'S TONNAGE TAX SYSTEM
To qualify
for the tonnage tax regime, an applicant must:
|
|
Operate
merchant ships in international shipping operations |
|
|
Be
a German shipowner |
|
|
Be
a commercial business having its management in Germany |
|
|
Make
an irrevocable application |
|
|
Meet
the relevant provisions of the German Income Tax Act |
Merchant
ships are deemed to be operated internationally if they are
mainly used to transport passengers or goods to or between
foreign ports, within a foreign port, or between a foreign
port and the high seas; or if they are mainly used outside
German territorial waters for towage, the survey of energy
deposits located below the sea bed, salvage or mineral exploration.
Their operation includes incidental and auxiliary activities.
They may be owned or chartered.
Ships
are considered as being mainly used for international shipping
operations if they are so used for more than half of the total
number of operating days. (Lay-up days are counted as operating
days, provided that "loss of hire" insurance was taken out.
So are brief shipyard stays. Extended shipyard stays, for
reconstruction or major repair work, are not counted as such.)
Vessels
are required to be primarily registered in Germany.
Upon
being accepted into the tonnage tax system, an applicant must
remain in it for a period of 10 years, and may not exit from
it voluntarily during that period.
Ownership
of a vessel by a German shipowner includes the commercial,
technical and staffing management of the ship. In particular,
the following activities are included:
|
|
Entering
into contracts for use of the ship |
|
|
Equipping
ships and providing food and drink |
|
|
Recruiting
of captains and ship's officers |
|
|
Providing
cargo for the ship |
|
|
Entering
into contracts for bunker fuel and lubricating oil |
|
|
Maintaining
the ship |
|
|
Entering
into an insurance contract on ship and equipment |
|
|
Keeping
books of account |
|
|
Accounting |
|
|
Effecting
and implementing the resolution of co-owners of the ship |
These
major activities must be carried out almost exclusively in
Germany.
In the
case of partnerships, entry into the tonnage tax system may
only be applied for on a joint basis, with each member of
a corporate group qualifying individually for tonnage tax.
With
respect to the operation of merchant ships, a distinction
is made between ships that are owned by a company and ships
that are chartered by it:
|
|
In
the case of ships that are owned by a company, the operation
of merchant ships includes both independent use and chartering,
provided the chartered ships are equipped - i.e., staffed
with crew and otherwise made operational - by the charterer.
Accordingly, "bareboat" chartering is excluded. In addition
to use and chartering, the operation of merchant ships,
as previously noted, also includes any incidental or auxiliary
activities that are directly related to the use and chartering
of ships. These activities include the sale of merchant
ships, as well as the sale of assets that directly serve
the operation of merchant ships. |
|
|
In
the case of chartered ships, their use in international
shipping operations may be covered by the tonnage tax
system if the following additional requirements are met:
|
|
|
|
In
the case of chartered vessels registered in a German ship
register, they are covered only if the merchant ships
that are owned by the company are simultaneously operated
in international shipping transactions |
|
|
|
In
the case of chartered ships not registered in a German
ship register, there is the additional proviso that the
net tonnage of the chartered ships does not exceed three
times the net tonnage of the merchant ships that are owned
by the company |
If a company
conducts other activities in addition to operating merchant
ships in international trades, profits from those activities
are subject to the ordinary corporate tax.
No depreciation
or equivalent allowances are available under the tonnage tax
system.
Computing
the Tonnage Tax
Taxable
profit, calculated on the basis of net tonnage, is determined
as follows:
STEP
1 - calculate the daily profit per ship
This
calculation is made by reference to an amount of profits
for each 100 tons, as follows:
For
each 100 tons up to 1,000 tons, euro 0.92
For each 100 tons between 1,000 and 10,000 tons, euro 0.69
For each 100 tons between 10,000 and 25,000 tons, euro 0.46
For each 100 tons above 25,000 tons, euro 0.23
STEP 2 - calculate the profit per ship for the accounting
period
Multiply
the daily profit for each ship by the number of international
operating days during the accounting period.
STEP
3 - calculate the corporate tax owed
Under
Germany's tonnage tax system, ship profits are taxed at
the ordinary rate applicable to corporate profits.
German
business profits are subject to two taxes: federal corporation
tax and municipal trade tax. Corporation tax is levied at
a uniform rate of 25 percent and is then subject to a surcharge
(the "solidarity levy") of 5.5 percent. The trade tax rate
varies by location from just under 12 percent to 20 percent
(around 18 percent for most larger cities). The local tax
is deductible as an expense for corporation tax.
Germany's
effective tax rate on corporate profits, as quoted by KPMG
International in its 2003 tax rate survey, is 39.58 percent.
The rate includes corporate tax, the surcharge on the corporate
tax, and trade tax.
Greece:
(updated
March, 2004)
Greece
established a tonnage tax system for Greek-flagged ships in
1975. The majority of the Greek tonnage tax provisions enjoy
a special status: They cannot be amended or abolished (save
for amendment of the tax rate) as long as the present provisions
of the Greek constitution regarding Greek commercial ships
remain in force.
The tonnage
tax is not elective - it is the only tax imposed on the registered
owners of Greek-flagged ships (no corporate tax is payable).
It is calculated by reference to a ship's category, age and
tonnage. (Actual profits deriving from the shipping business
are disregarded for tax purposes.)
At the
start of 2002, the tonnage tax on cargo ships that trade regularly
between Greek and foreign ports, or exclusively between foreign
ports, was reduced by 50 percent. Greek-flagged cruise vessels
also received the 50-percent reduction.
At the
same time, Greece reduced the tax burden on its seafarers,
cutting the income tax for officers from nine percent to six
percent and halving the tax rate on ratings to just three
percent.
SOME KEY PROVISIONS OF GREECE'S TONNAGE TAX SYSTEM
Greece's
tonnage tax law applies to all Greek-flagged ships used for
commercial purposes.
Ships
under the Greek flag are separated into two categories, with
the first category consisting of the following:
|
|
Bulk
carriers, tankers and reefers of at least 3,000 gross
tons. |
|
|
Steel
dry or wet cargoes, as well as reefers of between 500
and 3,000 gross tons, which undertake voyages to foreign
ports or navigate exclusively between foreign ports. |
|
|
Passenger
ships that undertake voyages to foreign ports or navigate
between foreign ports. |
|
|
Passenger
ships of more than 500 gross tons that have undertaken,
following a public announcement, regular trips exclusively
for leisure purposes for a period of at least six months
during the previous year. |
|
|
Floating
rigs having a displacement exceeding 5,000 tons, as well
as floating refineries used for exploration, drilling,
pumping, refining and storage of oil or natural gas. |
Under
the Greek tonnage tax system, the treatment of ships in the
second category (those not meeting the criteria listed above)
differs from that of first-category ships and will not be
considered further in this material.
Computing
the Greek Tonnage Tax
The tonnage
tax is calculated annually on the basis of a ship's age and
gross tonnage.
STEP
1 - calculate the ship's total taxable tonnage
Multiply
tonnage between 0 and 10,000 gross tons by 1.2
Multiply tonnage between 10,001 and 20,000 gross tons by
1.1
Multiply tonnage between 20,001 and 40,000 gross tons by
1
Multiply tonnage between 40,001 and 80,000 gross tons by
0.9
Multiply tonnage above 80,000 gross tons by 0.8
Example
for a 20,000-ton ship
First
10,000 tons X 1.2 = 12,000
Second 10,000 tons X 1.1 = 11,000
Total taxable tonnage = 23,000
STEP 2 - multiply the total taxable tonnage by a specified
rate (depending on the age of the ship), as follows:
| Age
of the ship |
Rate
(in US$) per gross ton* |
| |
|
|
| |
2003 |
2004
(116% increase on 1975 figures) |
| |
|
|
| 0
- 4 years |
1.1236 |
1.1448 |
| 5
- 9 years |
2.014 |
2.052 |
| 10
- 19 years |
1.9716 |
2.0088 |
| 20
- 29 years |
1.8656 |
1.9008 |
| 30
years or older |
1.4416 |
1.4688 |
*The
amounts payable for each gross ton have been increasing
by four percent annually since 1975. These amounts
will continue to rise by four percent annually until
the year 2005, when the figures will be re-examined.
If a
ship that is subject to the tonnage tax is not trading because
of repair work, lack of employment or for any other reason,
the tonnage tax payable is reduced in proportion to the number
of days during which the ship was not trading, provided that
this time period exceeds two consecutive months during the
previous or relevant financial year.
Greece's
tonnage taxation system covers any of a shipowner's income
that is derived from that shipowner's use of his Greek-flagged
ship(s) for commercial purposes. However, interest from bank
deposits comprised of fares and other monies derived from
the commercial use of ships is not deemed to constitute income
from shipping activities, and is therefore taxed under the
general rules of income taxation.
If a company
with ships under the Greek tonnage tax regime conducts other
business activities in addition to its shipping business,
an exemption from corporate income tax is only granted to
the portion of the company's net profits or dividends that
equals the ratio of the gross income from the company's shipping
business to its total gross income.
The following
exemptions apply to first category ships under the Greek tonnage
tax regime:
|
|
Ships
built in Greece and registered under the Greek flag are
exempt from tonnage tax until they are six years old |
|
|
Ships
that undertake regular voyages between Greek and foreign
ports, or exclusively between foreign ports, as well as
cruise vessels, are entitled to a 50-percent reduction
on the tonnage payable. |
|
|
Ships
less than 20 years old that have been repaired in Greece
are exempt from tonnage tax for a number of years corresponding
to one year for every US$100,000 spent on the repairs.
However, in order to benefit from the exemption, the cost
of repairs must have been paid using imported foreign
currency. This exemption cannot exceed 50 percent of the
total cost of the repairs, is applicable from the year
following the date of completion of the repairs, and is
valid for a maximum period of six years. |
These
tonnage tax exemptions are only applicable to ships that are
registered under the Greek flag for the first time; that is,
they are not applicable to ships that were registered with
the Greek shipping registry, were struck off, and were then
re-registered.
Ships
qualifying for more than one of the above exemptions may benefit
from only one exemption, selected by the shipowner by an irrevocable
declaration.
India:
(updated
November, 2003)
Indias
long-pending tonnage tax regime will be implemented from April
1, 2004, Minister of State for Shipping Dilipkumar M. Gandhi
announced in September.
Indias
parliament was expected to pass implementing legislation during
the winter session, around December-January.
Ireland:
(updated
January, 2003)
Prior
to January 1, 2003, taxable incomes from certain shipping
activities qualified for a 10 percent tax rate, as opposed
to the standard rate of corporation tax (previously 32 percent).
The current
corporate tax rate of 12.5 percent applies to the trading
profits of shipping and shipping service companies.
In February
1997, the Irish government announced its decision to substantially
reduce the levels of Pay Related Social Insurance, which employers
must pay for seafarers on their vessels. Sean Barrett, minister
for the marine, said: "The new system is further evidence
of the government's commitment to develop and maintain a strong
Irish shipping sector." He explained that the aim of the measure
was to "significantly increase the employment prospects of
Irish seafarers" by making it more cost-effective to employ
them on Irish vessels. In April 1996, Ireland introduced a
subsidy program for seafarer/trainees to enable them to compete
with UK counterparts for training placements on UK vessels.
TONNAGE
TAX REGIME IMPLEMENTED:
A tonnage-tax
provision was included in the Irish government's 2002 budget,
introduced in December 2001.
Frank
Fahey, Ireland's Minister for the Marine and Natural Resources,
said of the decision to adopt a tonnage-tax regime:
The
government approval for this unique flat rate tax linked
to tonnage will act as a catalyst to regenerate the
Irish shipping industry. The industry has been stagnant
in recent years and this new tax regime will ensure
a more attractive and enhanced fiscal environment. It
will offer certainty and clarity for future investment
and ensure the industry's competitiveness with those
in other (EU) member states.
Glenn
Murphy, director of the Irish Maritime Development Office,
also welcomed the measure, saying:
The industry was on the brink of collapse and our larger
owners would have been compelled to lower the Irish
flag and relocate their core business structures to
another country if the tonnage tax had not been announced
this year.
Irish
maritime interests have welcomed the new tonnage-tax regime.
The 2002
budget also provided Irish seafarers a special income tax
allowance, as well as full refunds of pay-related social insurance
to their employers.
IRISH
TONNAGE TAX GETS EC APPROVAL:
On December
11, 2002, the European Commission (EC) gave its approval to
the introduction of a tonnage tax in Ireland.
According
to the EC, the "favorable fiscal measures" will benefit the
employment of European Union (EU) seafarers and enhance the
competitiveness of the Irish fleet.
The new
system, based on the net tonnage of the fleet for all Irish
maritime companies engaged in international traffic, replaces
the standard corporation tax.
The EC
granted its approval once it was satisfied that the tax scheme
would meet all the EU guidelines on State aid to the maritime
transport industry.
"We very
much welcome the announcement as this now puts us on a level
playing field," said Gary O'Dea, Irish Ferries finance director.
SOME
KEY PROVISIONS OF IRELAND'S TONNAGE TAX SYSTEM:
Ireland's
tonnage tax is open to shipowners, bareboat charterers, and
ship management companies. The scheme does not require the
management company to have an ownership interest in the vessels.
The tonnage-tax
system offers an alternative method by which shipping companies
may calculate their profits for corporation tax purposes.
The profits, once calculated using the tonnage-tax method,
are subject to the 12.5 percent rate of corporation tax.
Profits
are calculated by reference to the tonnage of the ships used
in a company's shipping trade. Essentially, the "tonnage"
profits replace the accounting profits of the shipping company
for tax purposes.
The system
is elective: companies may choose whether to stay in the normal
corporation tax system or move their shipping activities into
tonnage tax.
If a company
enters the tonnage-tax system, it must stay in it for a minimum
of 10 years. Companies have a three-year period, beginning
from the date the minister for finance issues the order commencing
the scheme, to decide whether they want to enter it.
To qualify
for the tonnage-tax scheme, a company must meet three tests:
1) it must be within the charge of the Irish corporation tax;
2) it must operate qualifying ships; and 3) it must have a
sufficient presence in, and economic connection with, the
State to satisfy the EU requirement that a beneficiary of
State aid should have its strategic and commercial management
in an EU State.
All or
none of the qualifying companies in a group must enter the
scheme.
A "qualifying
shi |